Okay. First, the Credit Crunch. Correct me if I’m wrong, but in a nutshell I’d say it goes like this: bankers found that lending money was very profitable so they did it as much as possible even when it clearly wasn’t a very good idea and that was fine for a while but they couldn’t outrun it forever and now they lend only when it seems sensible and the government gave them a big pile of money because if all the banks collapse then everyone is fucked. Something like that, right? Only most of the petition site thinks the bailout money is there for the banks to recklessly lend to cretins:
by Geoff and Denise Molyneaux (rejected)
Get the Banks to stop the arrogance and start releasing tax payers money to the tax payer and their employers. The company I work for has been brought to its knees by the simple fact that the Banks are unwilling to lend money so that firms, like the one I work for can progress. Since October, when this started, they have laid off 20% of the work force. Previous to this the Company was booming. You can point the finger at one institution – the Banks of this country. HELP NOW before its too late. Gordon Brown, the man partly responsible for the biggest ressession in living memory.
Possibly I’m just missing something; it’s happened before. Maybe the banks were meant to lend out this bailout money. What I need is for someone to explain it to me in simple terms.
by Joseph Power (rejected)
It’s simple really, in light of the current economic situation we think it’s about time the government stepped in to help the people, small businesses and anyone else who is finding survival a struggle right now. We bailed out the banks recently and are paying for it in a number of ways. We need to see the banks lending again. If this does not happen then we are in trouble. Since the banks aren’t doing this out of their own concern for the welfare of the economy we think it’s time Mr Brown stepped in to stop this financial triage.
No, I still think I’m right. Possibly I’ve just massively missed the point of ecomomics. I mean, as far is I can tell the only difference between Credit Crunch and Normal Times is that in Credit Crunch we’re only allowed to spend money we own, which is basically what I tried to do anyway. I thought that was the point of money.
This one is scary but mysterious. This one appears twice, but comes with a free mental image of the Queen in a blender. This one is funny purely because of a mistake which reverses the petition’s aims. This one is a duplicate of this other one:
by Lorne McCallum (rejected)
The undersigned believe bendy buses should be made to make accordian noises when going round cxorners. This follows a popular campaign on social networking site ‘facebook’, we believe this would greatly benefit the community and increase the popularity of bendy buses. Road rage would also be hilarious
This person has lost at Monopoly once too often:
by Philip Ambler (rejected)
More details cannot be shown
This one is a bit scary:
by Dave (rejected)
The PM must wait by the mailbox at 6PM on March 1st. He knows why. A man will call him on his mobile phone- the PM must refer to him as ‘Joe’. Instructions will come then.
Presumably it’s a joke, though. This one I’m less sure about:
by Bruno Cooke (rejected)
I feel that giving free sweets to the general public on Fridays would increase their working concentration and enjoyment in the workplace. Spirits would be lifted and everyone would be generally happier, causing them to work more enjoyably and perform better. This would, in turn, improve productivity and performance, resulting in an increased level of economic activity in the UK and hastening the end of the credit crunch. Ta-dah!
Here is yet another petition demanding that Facebook groups they disagree with be banned. We may need a category for that. And now, in reverse order: the biggest twats in the world:
3. Jeremy Clarkson
2. People who jokingly say Jeremy Clarkson should be PM.
1. People who call him ‘Jezza’.
by Emily (rejected)
Jezza is the greatest – making him PM would be great – no more car tax, bendy buses, highly priced fuel (well, possible diesel) or stupid extra government money gaining taxes to do with anything.
Well, I mean obviously Anne Widdecombe is worse than most of those people, but only really because she has more power. This next one, I think, would be better off just asking for the county lines to be moved. It would seem to save a lot of work.
by Connor Justin Norman-Read
lowestoft would benefit threw administrive power, money, Waveney District council are in debt yet they want to build a campas however they recentley laid workers beacause of the debt. gorlston left suffolk and went to norfolk not that long ago lowestoft should do the same. suffolk countey council is the reason why lowestoft does not have a third crossing however great yarmouth needs one to but are more likeley to get one beacuse they are in norfolk and the goverement pump money into great yarmouth why do you think it has more retail parks than lowestoft. lowestoft is with g yarmouth for 1st east regeneration g yarmouth has a outer harbour being built nothing has happened to lowestoft. by combining the lowestoft and great yarmouth it will nearley have the population of norwich. norwich is still east anglias capital city and its in norfolk. suffolk has ipswich but its a town.
This one I share purely for its confusing the word ‘ludicrous’ with the rapper ‘Ludacris’. I love those petitions. They’re rare but beautiful.
by james h
This pertition is to ALLOW MARCHES ON PARLIAMENT because it’s ludacris that they have made it a illegal to do so. It was made illegal just because the metropolitan police had to short notice. It’s our RIGHT if we choose to march on parliament it’s our free will to do so. Our civil liberties are being eroded what will it be next just because someone doesn’t like what your saying you will not be allowed to say it next. THERE IS NO FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN THIS COUNTRY. ALLOW MARCHES ON PARLIAMENT
Meanwhile, Anna Ioannou, while selfishly hoarding all the vowels, is so confident that everyone supports her ideas that she’s going to lump them all into one giant petition with one stupid URL. And that might work if she wasn’t demonstrably a slathering cretin who thinks that anyone who breaks the slightest law must be inherently evil somehow:
by anna ioannou (rejected)
we would like the government to end the pampering of criminals, stop using our money to give some criminals a new identity when they are released, make the prisons harder, we want the prisons to be as they should be, no television, computer games, cd’s etc, we want zero tollerance on crime, we want tougher sentences so crime does not pay, life to mean life.we want back our freedom of speech. we want the government to stop pandering to political correctness.
we want to bring back national service and send first time offenders to army style boot camp. we want the government to stop telling us what we should eat, what we should buy, not to smoke and not to drink, we can make our own decisions based on the infomation provided.
And now it’s time for The Conflict In Gaza. Again, I may have got this wrong, but here is how I understand the situation: the history is really complicated but the problem boils down to the fact that everyone in the Middle East is forced to join at least one violent and insane cult all of which want all the others, and any countries forced to support them, wiped out in as bloody a massacre as possible despite the fact that they all agree on basically nearly everything, because the only significant effect religion has on the world is to turn otherwise only mildly disagreeable people into utter cunts and murderers. So now Israel have neighbours who keep firing rockets at them but can’t respond because they’re so much bigger and anything they do seems like an over-reaction, and Gaza can’t do anything right either because their democratically elected government is a known terrorist group. Nobody can broker peace because it’s hard to negotiate a demand like ‘we want everyone else killed’ and the war can’t be won and if it was then frankly the idea of one supercult is even scarier than the million warring factions we have now. Something like that. But there may be a solution:
by Ian Martin of MARTIAN FM (rejected)
We the undersigned abhor and condemn Israel’s military aggression. We believe that banning Israel from Eurovison this year would, because of its trivial nature and huge audience reach, be taken more seriously by Israel than any academic boycott or demonstration, however shrill.
Of all Israeli exports, its pop music is the easiest to boycott as nobody cares whether they hear it or not. And don’t say we’re not being even-handed. We can’t call for Palestine to be evicted. Palestinians aren’t allowed to take part in Eurovision. Even though they live right next to Israel. Which let’s face it is actually in the Middle East. Not Europe.
No hang on, that wasn’t the one I meant to post…
by Liam Gilmartin (rejected)
As the Israeli government get ready to hit the 1000 dead Palestinians mark without criticism from Gordon Brown, will the PM let us know what more the IDF can do to elicit even a slither of criticism from Britain?
No, look, we’ve been over this. Your title should be a clear call to arms, starting in a verb. Watch a master at work:
by syed (rejected)
i want israel to stop bombing civialian and stoped the war as soon as possibal
See? That’s all we have to do. We just have to stoped the war as soon as possibal. Why didn’t everyone think of that sooner?
So now that that’s sorted, let’s turn our attention to problems at home:
by James wooler of putting Britain right (rejected)
We togeather can ban this, ‘chavy’ and ‘boy racer’ type car so we will finally be safe on the roads of the UK,
Instead of driving along and hearing the ridiculus ‘Boom’ of the sub and the ‘Borm and screaming of the 1.1 litre engine. This will benift all of the genaral public as this may reduce tyre prices as the owners will stop ‘Pointlessly’ wheel spinning there cereal toys.
Oh, apparently we don’t have any. I’m intrigued by the idea that reducing demand will reduce prices. Also, I’ve noticed that ‘criminals’ and ‘robbers’ go to jail, so logically if we ban jail the problem will go away.
Did you know that the Girl Guides keep a list of people who are members of the Girl Guides?
by Dave Jones (rejected)
Girlguiding – Rainbows, Brownies & Guides is building a national database of all the girls in the units. This database will contain the details of thousands of girls in the UK, such as age, parents names, telephone numbers, email, race, ethic groups etc.
Whilst Girlguiding maintains this information is "safe" we have grave concerns how a voluntary organisation like Guiding going to ensure total security.
Once this information is leaked or lost into the public domain ALL the girls are at risk . This is precisely why many people have the same concerns over the governments intended contactpoint children’s database. Indeed the conservatives have promised to scrap this database as itis a high risk.
The Deloitte report about the ContactPoint database. stated "It should be noted that risk can only be managed, not eliminated, and therefore there will always be a risk of data security incidents occurring"
If we have serious concerns over the ContactPoint database then we should not allow a voluntary organisation to do the same with fewer controls.
The repercussions of information falling into the wrong hands could be extremely dangerous
I know, shocking, isn’t it?
by Fran Powles (rejected)
Proposals are suggested that inmates of Guantanamo Bay should be housed in our over stretched infrastructure.
We the undersigned refuse this outragous suggestion on an already over populated Island.
Far be it to suggest that you’re actually more angry about the idea of immigrants living here than terrorists, but…
by Donna-Marie Fay
(rejected)
Keep imigrants out for good! KEEP BRITAIN BRITISH!
Coming over here, not even learning the language enough to spell the word ‘immigrant’ correctly in a petition to the government about immigrants…
Lastly,here is one of about five petitions about Graham Stringer posted in the last week:
by Matthew Gregg (rejected)
Recently, Graham Stringer MP has made comments where he claims dyslexia is a myth. This is clearly not true. There are several people in the UK living with dyslexia today, and for them day-to-day life is very hard. He is lying, as according to the British Dyslexic Association, 10% of his constituents suffer from the condition. The condition is not ‘cruel fiction’, and should not be consigned to the ‘dustbin of history’. As you can clearly see, Graham Stringer MP is making clearly false statements, and should be removed from his MP seat as soon as possible.
I am beginning to suspect there exists a variant of dyslexia which causes the sufferer to be staggeringly ignorant of Parliamentary procedure.