Posted by Ben @ July 14th, 2010 8:58 pm. Filed under: Abolish This!,Anything I Want Is A Human Right,Batshit Mental Rants,Clearly You've Thought This Through,Don't Worry About What THEY Want,Duplicate Petitions,Hanging's Too Good For 'Em!,Is Research The Same Thing As Making Shit Up? Good.,Please State The Nature of the Medical Emergency,Sexism,Stand Back! I'm Going To Try SCIENCE!,Stop Spending My Money On Things I Don't Understand.,Unreasonable Demands,What A Dick,Won't Somebody Please Think Of The Children?,You Know - We Haven't Banned Anything Lately. — Tags: AndyCC, ngreer —
Abortion. Touchy subject. Touchy enough for at least two petitions on YourFreedom.
Someone decides to have sex, they should live with the concequences. Abortion should be banned for all social economic reasons.Life is a sacred thing, whether you believe it is from God or not, people these days think that you just pop-out of the womb on the day you are born, but it starts before that within the womb.
If people disagree with banning Abortion for social economic reasons, could they please explain why it is differnt to killing a 5 year old because they are not an Adult yet?
Abortion is just legalised mass murder, wrapped up to make everyone feel good about it.
Why the contribution is important
Why should an innocent unborn child be murdered simply because of a “bad” choice to have sex?Why should the taxpayer pay for this? And for the clumsy decisions of others not to use protection?
Why the contribution is important
The right to life is a fundamental human right. The unborn are human. At the moment of conception they become, by any reasonable definition, human. They are genetically members of the species homo sapiens, and between that moment and birth, there is no clear dividing line when a change occurs. If there is no clear dividing line, then no change occurs (if it is illegal to kill at some precise moment and not before, that must be because a significant change occurs at that moment).It follows that to kill the unborn is murder, and the clear denial of that unborn child’s right to life. We will not execute murderers and rapists because of this principle, but we will inflict a particularly brutal killing on defenceless, innocent children. This is unnacceptable in any society that aspires to be civilised.
let’s ignore all of the bollocks pseudo-science and half-arsed presumptions in these petitions and jump to the crux of the matter: making abortion illegal.
What about where protection is used? What about rape? What about incest rape? What about instances where the baby won’t survive childbirth? What about instances where the mother won’t survive childbirth? What about where the baby will be born without a brain? Or, rather simply, what if the woman simply isn’t ready to be a mother? It’s her body, her choice, and she shouldn’t be forced into motherhood against her will, be it because she was attacked in the park or because she just doesn’t want to have kids.
Even taking all of these variables out of the picture, making abortion illegal isn’t going to help. The women that want abortions are still going to find ways of getting them, being it going abroad to somewhere else in Europe where it’s still legal. Or, if that’s not an option, they’ll seek out a “back alley abortion” where statistics show they will, in fact, wind up dead.
So, long story short, it seems AndyCC and ngreer hate women, they don’t think a woman is entitled to ownership of her own uterus.
Posted by Ben @ April 24th, 2010 9:00 am. Filed under: Hanging's Too Good For 'Em!,It Says So In The Daily Mail,Not actual justice -- just what I wanted. Which is basically the same thing.,Rejected Petitions,This Is What We're Outraged At This Week,Won't Somebody Please Think Of The Children?,spelin an grammer — Tags: james agius, jedd henry karl wallace —
And still the ePetition team rejects petitions! This is most irregular. Still, we have semi-literate scrotum wranglers submitting petitions about things that the papers have told them to feel very angry about. What is it? Oh yes, more James Bulger stuff.
by james agius (rejected)James bulger was killedd when he was 2 years old by 2 pieces of scum john venables and robert thompson His killers aged 10 at the time have since been released. Jame’s family has been let down by the justice system so much.Now one of Jame’s killers has broken one release rule by doing another crime!should he have been out in the first place?what they did was planned and they knew exactly that the little boy should die.Do you want this scum on a street near your child or grand son? put them back away now please help with this petition. Petition: With this petition I hope to gain as many signature,s to take away the rights of having so much privacy and protection for child killers. For The sake of James’ parents please stop wasting tax payers money by protecting the evil. Make them lose their right to keep the public informed of any future crimes they may commit.
Justice: Serving time for the crime you committed. Which, insofar as the James Bulger killing is concerned, I think has been fulfilled.
Fun fact: The British newspapers made a point of calling James “Jamie Bulger” in all correspondence because it made the youngster seem more innocent, as if him being a two year-old wasn’t enough. His parents never called him Jamie.
Still,a t least the papers got his last name right, unlike this bugger:
Reveal the identitys of James bunglers killers and let The british people vote what happens to them.by jedd henry karl wallace (rejected)I and many others are disgusted at The killers of James Bungler and believe justice should be handed to the people as we are a democracy and in a democracy the people have a right to decide
Firstly, if you’re going to be pissed off about something at least have the common decency to do the basic research first, otherwise you just come across as a bit of a tit. Secondly, everything else that’s wrong with this petition.
Presumably “jedd henry karl wallace” is one person with four names and not, say, the four members of a new, badly-informed and horribly illiterate boy band.
Posted by Ben @ April 21st, 2010 2:12 am. Filed under: Hanging's Too Good For 'Em!,I AM TALKING!,I'm Keeping The Whole Class Back,Presumably The Prime Minister Is Not Too Busy,Reject Rednesday,Rejected Petitions,The Nasty Television Upset Me!,Thinking Things Through Is Just Not British,What A Load Of Bankers — Tags: Aleksands Halamins, Keith Jones, Mrs Theresa Thomas —
Have a petition. Hey, I’m feeling generous – have three.
by Aleksands Halamins (rejected)I am sick and tired of teachers using “sick pay” advantages not to come and teach at school. Moreover, we as a taxpayer finance these sick off days and instead we have to pay the supply teacher as well as the teacher who is “ill”. Making most state school teachers self-employed will make them realize that that’s the way it goes: if you don’t come to school to teach – you wont get paid, as simple as that! Making the teachers self-employed will have its own disadvantages, however as a self-employed you will pay less tax and also you could make claims. Making the teachers self-employed will improve their attendance. Furthermore, this decision will 100% improve education in BRITAIN!
Yeah! Teachers don’t come to school at all! All they do is lounge about at home watching Diagnosis Murder and raking in the cash. This’ll teach ‘em.
by keith jones of taxpaying pensioner with no political nor religious affiliation (rejected)Gordon Brown has created the worst financial situation in the history of people living on this island. There has to be some merit in considering what horrendous fate should befall somebody who has done more damage to this country than any other single person, living or dead.
Keith Jones there, politely asking the government to think about cutting Gordon Brown’s head off.
by Mrs Theresa Thomas (rejected)This is an official petition to have Frankie Boyle return to the quiz show ‘Mock The Week’. Frankie is an asset to the quiz show and British lives are not the same with out him.
The government have officially rejected your official petition, because it’s officially crap.
Posted by Ben @ April 16th, 2010 5:39 am. Filed under: Everyone Stop What You're Doing Because You're Mildly Inconveniencing Me,Hanging's Too Good For 'Em!,I AM TALKING!,I Petition The Government To Your Name Here,Rejected Petitions,The Nasty Television Upset Me!,What Would Idiot-Jesus Do?,Won't Somebody Please Think Of The Children?,Work Around My Delusions Dammit!,You Know - We Haven't Banned Anything Lately. — Tags: Adam Carr, Joe McGurk, Michael Lee of Retired, Mr Dean Askew, Mr Francis Guidera, Mr Joseph Cornforth —
I guess the ePetition team has a backlog to get through, because there have been a ton of rejected petitions posted today.
by Mr Dean Askew (rejected)Celery is disgusting, please ban it forthwith!
This seems reasonable. (more…)
Posted by Ben @ April 5th, 2010 7:17 pm. Filed under: Gibberish,Hanging's Too Good For 'Em!,I Must Be Of Something,I Petition The Government To Your Name Here,Not actual justice -- just what I wanted. Which is basically the same thing.,Rejected Petitions,We Petition The PM To Climb This Wall Of Text,What A Load Of Bankers — Tags: Mark Johannsen of Myself —
by Mark Johannsen of Myself (rejected)Banks, Building Societies and Utility Companies can submit what they like to Credit Rating Agencies who then have the ability to sell information about individuals and companies. This could be as the result of a dispute or late payment. These bodies can submit information unchecked and not available to be scrutinised by the person or body they are dambing. Yet if you kill a 2 year old boy and throw his body on a railway track it is in the public interest to hide the killers identity. The crime these two boys commited was truly horrific, they were found guilty in a court. Big business can ruin people without a trial or any cross examination. 2 things need to be done .1 expose the murders protect them if necessary from vigilanties but don’t let them hide and 2 before companies put dambing information on Credit Reports the information should be scrutinised and the person accused should have a chance to put their point across.
There’s a lot going on in this petition, and it’s all shit.
Posted by Ben @ April 1st, 2010 12:38 am. Filed under: Hanging's Too Good For 'Em!,I Accidentally The Whole Thing,Not actual justice -- just what I wanted. Which is basically the same thing.,spelin an grammer — Tags: Shane Dalton —
by Shane DaltonMake the Life sentence mean Life, harsher sentencing for violent crime and more aftercare and support for victims and their families. At present sentences are too lenient which is why many of them go on to
Go on to what? “A way out of this”? Is that what you were going to say? S-speak, Dalton. How can we change what’s happening?
Posted by Andrew @ March 4th, 2010 12:47 am. Filed under: Hanging's Too Good For 'Em!,Rejected Petitions,Won't Somebody Please Think Of The Children? — Tags: cazzer dickson —
by cazzer dickson (rejected)these boys seriousle assaulted 3 young boys in a week leaving them traumatised and one in a coma They have been given a minimum of 5 years which should be changed to life. When released they will have a life the 3 boys they attacked will not
The “DEVIL BOYS”, as you insist on calling them, were ten and eleven years old. You want to put a ten year old boy in prison for the rest of his life?
The “DEVIL BOYS” are children. You make me sick.
Posted by Ben @ March 1st, 2010 4:20 pm. Filed under: Hanging's Too Good For 'Em!,Rejected Petitions,spelin an grammer — Tags: Sharon Cooper —
by Sharon Cooper (rejected)If Adultry was actually a law punished by castration or female circumsition. This would put people off doing it and would also save goverment endless divorce fees paid by legal aid.This punishment would also cost alot less than prison.
Either that or it’d put a stop to marriage entirely.
Posted by Ben @ January 26th, 2010 9:54 pm. Filed under: Clearly You've Thought This Through,Duplicate Petitions,Hanging's Too Good For 'Em!,You and What Army? — Tags: Mr J Bradshaw —
by Mr J BradshawThere are too many crimes now which consist of murder,homicide, rapists by gangs and disturbing individuals.
Instead of sending them to prison with small sentences or life sentences I consider it would be better to see these people (from 16+) placed into army training grounds, trained and then placed on the front-line.
This might make them realise what they have done wrong and change them into something better!
Or it’ll be the British government putting weapons in the hands of convicted murderers and rapists. I can’t say I particularly approve of that.
Posted by Ben @ January 26th, 2010 9:18 pm. Filed under: Hanging's Too Good For 'Em!,Unenforceable Laws,Unreasonable Demands,Unworkable Ideas,Won't Somebody Please Think Of The Children? — Tags: Mr. Graham Lerant —
by Mr. Graham LerantIn the case of very serious crime by children under the age of eighteen, the Crown should have the power to test if the parents should be held criminally responsible for the actions of their children. The test should be on the balance of probability that their parenting was significantly to blame, or not, for the behaviour of their children. The test should be conducted in a high court with a judge and jury. If the test finds that they were significantly to blame they should face the legal consequences for the actions of their children as anyone else convicted of the same crime.
Graham neglects to mention what that test would entail, largely because no such test exists. Irrespective of upbringing, a child is still a person and should be held responsible for their actions, you fucking dunderninny.
Posted by Ben @ November 25th, 2009 1:22 am. Filed under: Hanging's Too Good For 'Em!,Won't Somebody Please Think Of The Children?,spelin an grammer — Tags: Denise Ann Dent —
by Denise Ann DentI would like to see if parents of teenager girls proscuted the man who their daughter pregnant.
Yes, that’ll learn ‘em to give in to the biological imperative!
Posted by Ben @ November 23rd, 2009 11:34 pm. Filed under: ...Or Else!,Commas,Exclamation marks!!!!,Hanging's Too Good For 'Em!,Lord Knows I Ask Not For Myself,spelin an grammer — Tags: kelly lawler —
by kelly lawlerits a hard ,full time job being a parent and very rewarding too ,but its not fair how some parents have to struggle alone. most of us dont have help on hand and struggle to make ends meet. the absent parent should face a jail sentance if they dont pay for their children.the csa does not do enough and are lenient on the absent parent. this is wrong. you can go to jail for not paying council tax so why cant you go to jail for not paying child support? children are more important. it takes 2 to make a baby,you should not be allowed to run away from your responsibilty. pay or face jail !!!
And, what, once they’re in jail they’ll see the error of their ways and start paying, will they?